Bindinglaw

DE · rules

D.R.E. 702

Testimony by Expert Witnesses

activein force · 2026-09-23 – presentact-effective-date

A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience,

training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if:

(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help

the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;

(b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;

(c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and

(d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of

the case.

History

Comment D.R.E. 702 was amended in 2001 to track F.R.E. 702 in effect on December 31, 2000. D.R.E. 702 is consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999) and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). See also M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. LeBeau, Del. Supr., 737 A.2d 513 (1999) (adopting Kumho Tire and Daubert as the correct interpretation of D.R.E. 702), Nelson v. State, Del. Supr., 628 A.2d 69 (1993). D.R.E. 702 was amended in 2017 in response to the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The amendment is intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in ruling on evidence admissibility.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
2026-09-23
Content hash
224e2abe31f89159a22734f62512af4f0a2ac46dc658b190dfcb514a3c2e2060
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.R.E. 702 — Testimony by Expert Witnesses · binding.law