DE · rules

D.R.E. 609

Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction

activein force · 2026-09-23 – presentact-effective-date

(a) General rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness,

evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime must be admitted but

only if the crime (1) constituted a felony under the law under which the

witness was convicted, and the court determines that the probative value of

admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect or (2) involved

dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment.

(b) Time limit. Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a

period of more than 10 years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of

the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction,

whichever is the later date, unless the court determines, in the interests of

justice, that the probative value of the conviction supported by specific facts

and circumstances substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect. However,

evidence of a conviction more than 10 years old, as calculated herein, is not

admissible unless the proponent gives to the adverse party sufficient advance

written notice of intent to use it so that the party has a fair opportunity to

contest its use.

of a conviction is not admissible under this rule if (1) the conviction has been

the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation or other

equivalent procedure based on a finding of the rehabilitation of the person

convicted, and that person has not been convicted of a subsequent felony, or

(2) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment or other

equivalent procedure based on a finding of innocence.

(d) Juvenile adjudications. Evidence of juvenile adjudications is generally

not admissible under this rule. The court may, however, in a criminal case,

allow evidence of a juvenile adjudication of a witness other than the accused

if conviction of the offense would be admissible to attack the credibility of

an adult and the court is satisfied that admission in evidence is necessary for

a fair determination of the issue of guilt or innocence.

(e) Pendency of appeal. A conviction that satisfies this rule is admissible

even if an appeal is pending. Evidence of the pendency is also admissible.

History

Comment The Permanent Advisory Committee on the Delaware Uniform Rules of Evidence recommended retaining D.R.E. 609 as it existed in 2001, with one minor word change in D.R.E. 609(c), and not adopt F.R.E. 609 in effect on December 31, 2000. The Committee recommended rejecting F.R.E. 609 because it applies a different test of admissibility for felony impeachment between a defendant-witness and a witness. The Committee believed that this rule should be the same for all witnesses. A question as to the admissibility of a felony conviction under DRE 609(a)(1) should first be presented to the trial judge out of the presence of the jury to permit the judge to apply the rule’s required balancing analysis. D.R.E. 609(b) tracks F.R.E. 609(b). D.R.E. 609(c) tracks F.R.E. 609(c) except it substitutes the word “felony” for the words “crime which was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year.” D.R.E. 609(d) and (e) track F.R.E. 609(d) and (e). For cases illustrating the law covered by D.R.E. 609, see Archie v. State, Del. Supr., 721 A.2d 924 (1998); Wilson v. Sico, Del. Supr., 713 A.2d 923 (1998); Tucker v. State, Del. Supr., 692 A.2d 416 (1996) (Table), Webb v. State, Del. Supr., 663 A.2d 452 (1995); Gregory v. State, Del. Supr., 616 A.2d 1198 (1992). D.R.E. 609 was amended in 2017 in response to the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The amendment is intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in ruling on evidence admissibility.

Provenance

Source: courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-23
Edition: 2026-09-23
Content hash: 60da33eac48727ca5acc1aaab6abc42a9402aa8440c84387bf5d185db6c718e2

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs