DE · rules
D.R.E. 508
Secrets of State and Other Official Information; Governmental Privileges
(a) Claim of privilege. If the law of the United States creates a
governmental privilege that the courts of this State must recognize under the
Constitution of the United States, the privilege may be claimed as provided
by the law of the United States.
(b) Recognition of privilege. A governmental privilege existing at common
law, or created by the Constitution, statute or court rule of this State, shall be
recognized.
(c) Effect of sustaining claim. If a claim of governmental privilege is
sustained and it appears that a party is thereby deprived of material evidence,
the court shall make any further orders the interests of justice require,
including striking the testimony of a witness, declaring a mistrial, finding
upon an issue as to which the evidence is relevant or dismissing the action.
History
Comment Rule 508(a) and (c) tracks U.R.E. 508 which is based on draft of F.R.E. 509. See comment to Rule 501. Rule 508(b) is new. The Committee believed that U.R.E. 508(b), which would abolish all governmental privileges except as created by the Constitution or statutes, is undesirable. For prior Delaware cases illustrating this area of law, see Morris v. Avallone, Del. Super., 272 A.2d 344 (1970); Smith v. Smith, 18 Del. 365 (1899). For a statute relating to this area of law, see 29 Del. C., Chapter 100 (Freedom of Information Act).
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- 2026-09-23
- Content hash
ef2a0ab01e311de23af07f7965fb9b5d9ec8cc38926f6090bf8ede3d39ae568e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.