DE · rules
D.R.E. 301
Presumptions in Civil Cases Generally
(a) Effect. In a civil case, unless a statute or these Rules provide otherwise,
the party against whom a presumption is directed has the burden of proving
that the nonexistence of the presumed fact is more probable than the
existence of the presumed fact.
(b) Inconsistent Presumptions. If presumptions are inconsistent, the
presumption founded upon weightier policy considerations applies. If policy
considerations are of equal weight, then neither presumption applies.
History
Comment Pre-2017 Rule 301(a) was based on U.R.E. 301(a), except the word “civil” was added in the first line. The Committee rejected F.R.E. 301. F.R.E. 301 was adopted by Congress as a substitute for the proposal of the United States Supreme Court Advisory Committee. The Federal Rule as adopted by Congress embraces the “bursting bubble” rule. See Usery v. Turner, 428 U.S. 1, 96 S. Ct. 2882, 49 L. Ed. 2d 752 (1976). The rule adopted is similar to the rule proposed by the United States Supreme Court Advisory Committee. The Committee was aware of the holding in Bennett v. Andree, Del. Super., 264 A.2d 353, aff’d, Del. Supr., 270 A.2d 173 (1970) and believes that its holding is not in conflict with the rule set forth herein. Pre-2017 Rule 301(b) tracked U.R.E. 301(b). For prior Delaware case illustrating the law covered by this rule, see Hill v. McKay, Del. Super., 113 A. 804 (1921). D.R.E. 301 was amended in 2017 in response to the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The amendment is intended to be stylistic only. The pre-2017 “Comment” to D.R.E. 301 was revised only as necessary to reflect the 2017 amendments. There is no intent to change any result in ruling on evidence admissibility.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- 2026-09-23
- Content hash
6667e017fb0b95a3e409eaf0526f9a3edbd10ae16719b0deec647d2b751b8c9c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.