DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 4.40A
Hung Jury Supplemental Charge
HUNG JURY SUPPLEMENTAL CHARGE
Members of the jury, I have a note indicating that you have not yet been able
to reach a unanimous verdict. You have been deliberating for over 2 hours. Although
that may seem like a long time to you, it is a relatively short period for jury
deliberations in view of the serious nature of this case.
This trial has consumed time, energy, emotions and resources of the State, the
victim's family and the defendant. If you should fail to agree upon a verdict, this case
will remain open and undecided and must be disposed of at some later time. There
appears to be no reason to believe that another trial would not be equally taxing on
the resources of all those involved, nor does there appear to be any reason to believe
that another jury, viewing the same evidence, would face a less difficult decision.
Since it is your duty to reach a unanimous verdict if you are able to do so
without violating your individual judgment and conscience, I will ask you to resume
your deliberations and, in addition to the instructions previously given to you, to
consider the following principles during your renewed deliberations:
a. Every juror, as part of the deliberation process, should consider and
weigh the recollections and opinions of every other juror in reaching his
or her conclusions. The collective memory, experience, judgment and
common sense of the entire jury panel should provide the basis for each
juror's individual decision.
b. In the course of deliberations, a juror should not hesitate to reexamine
his or her own views and change an opinion if the juror is convinced by
a review of the evidence, the law and the logic of other jurors that such
opinion is erroneous; and
c. No juror should surrender his or her honest conviction as to the weight
or effect of the evidence solely because of the opinions of the other jurors
or for the mere purpose of returning a verdict.
I wish to emphasize that, by making these remarks, the Court is not intending
in any way to suggest what your verdict should be. You may conduct your
deliberations as you choose, but I suggest that you should now retire to
carefully reconsider all the evidence bearing upon the questions before the jury
and the opinions of the other jurors relating to the evidence in determining
whether or not you are able to fulfill your duty to reach a unanimous verdict
without violating your individual judgment and conscience.
The jury will now retire to continue its deliberations.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
5391135dab8690982cc00bcbc83b2d1e7bf97cbb3756ae899ed31dd0276f56b3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.