DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 4.4
Evidence of Other Alleged Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts
EVIDENCE OF OTHER ALLEGED CRIMES, WRONGS, OR ACTS
You [are about to hear/have heard] evidence of certain acts allegedly
committed by the defendant. These acts are other than the alleged wrongdoing for
which the defendant is now on trial.
You may not consider these other acts for the purpose of concluding that the
defendant has a certain character, or character trait, and was acting in conformity
with that character or character trait with respect to the crimes charged in this case.
You may not use the evidence of other acts to conclude that the defendant is a bad
person, or has a tendency to commit criminal acts, and is therefore probably guilty
of the charged crimes.
You may use evidence relating to other acts allegedly committed by the
defendant only to determine issues relevant to the charged crimes. In this case, the
State contends that the evidence of other acts relates to the defendant's [motive,
opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake or
accident, consciousness of guilt, proof of consent or lack of consent, presence or
absence of extreme emotional distress, presence or absence of certain psychiatric
or psychological conditions, mental state, etc.]. You may consider such evidence
or other acts for this purpose only.
As with any other evidence presented at trial, you, the jurors, are the sole
finders of fact. You must decide what, if any, weight the evidence should be
given.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
4f5a4e4e3f813e65855a9fe005b47c0401edb3fd6278dd2f6b0da1caec0be701
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.