DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.935(2)b
Misuse of Computer System Information[Interruption/Addition]
MISUSE OF COMPUTER SYSTEM INFORMATION
In order to find Defendant guilty of Misuse of Computer System Information,
you must find the State has proved the following two (2) elements beyond a
reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant interrupted or added data to the data residing within the
computer system; and
(2) Defendant acted intentionally or recklessly.
In this case, [the State concedes the value of the property or services is less than
$1,500. No further proof regarding the value of the property or services is needed and
the correct offense is Misuse of Computer System Information - Class A
Misdemeanor/the State contends the value of the property or services is at least $1,500
and is therefore charging Defendant with Misuse of Computer System Information -
Class G Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value of the
property or services is greater than $1,500 and so indicate on the verdict sheet/the
State contends the value of the property or services is greater than $5,000 and is
therefore charging Defendant with Misuse of Computer System Information - Class E
Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value of the
property or services is greater than $5,000 and so indicate on the verdict sheet/the
State contends the value of the property or services is greater than $10,000 and is
therefore charging Defendant with Misuse of Computer System Information - Class
D Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value of the
property or services is greater than $10,000 and so indicate on the verdict sheet/[if
applicable] the State contends Defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of
serious physical injury to another person, and is therefore charging Defendant with
Misuse of Computer System Information - Class G Felony. Therefore, you must find
beyond a reasonable doubt Defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of serious
physical injury to another person and so indicate on the verdict sheet.]
“Intentionally” means that it was the defendant's conscious objective or purpose
misuse computer system information.
“Recklessly” means Defendant was aware of and consciously disregarded a
substantial and unjustifiable risk that misuse would result from Defendant’s conduct.
The State must demonstrate the risk was of such a nature and degree that Defendant’s
disregard of the risk was a gross deviation from the standard of conduct a reasonable
person would observe under the same circumstances.
"Computer" means a programmable, electronic device capable of accepting and
processing data.
"Computer system" means a computer, its software, related equipment and
communications facilities, if any, and includes computer networks.
"Data" means information of any kind in any form, including computer
software.
"Property" means anything of value, including data.
[if applicable]
[“Serious physical injury” means physical injury which creates a substantial risk
of death, or which causes serious and prolonged disfigurement, prolonged impairment
of health or prolonged loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ, or
which causes the unlawful termination of a pregnancy without the consent of the
pregnant female.]
“Value” means the market value of the property or services at the time and place
of the offense, or if that cannot be easily determined, the cost of replacing the property
or services within a reasonable time after the crime occurred.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
6fa829a990cca1a5ba1b57b62f46f0170ce838b0f1dafe7c007098cecc99c88f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.