DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.933
Theft of Computer Services
THEFT OF COMPUTER SERVICES
In order to find Defendant guilty of Theft of Computer Services, you must find
the State has proved the following three (3) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant accessed, caused to be accessed, used or caused to be used, a
computer system;
(2) Defendant obtained unauthorized computer services, software or data as a
result of Defendant’s access to or use of the computer system; and
(3) Defendant acted intentionally.
In this case, [the State concedes the value of the property or services is less than
$1,500. No further proof regarding the value of the property or services is needed and
the correct offense is Theft of Computer Services - Class A Misdemeanor/the State
contends the value of the property or services is at least $1,500 and is therefore
charging Defendant with Theft of Computer Services - Class G Felony. Therefore, you
must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value of the property or services is greater
than $1,500 and so indicate on the verdict sheet/the State contends the value of the
property or services is greater than $5,000 and is therefore charging Defendant with
Theft of Computer Services - Class E Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a
reasonable doubt the value of the property or services is greater than $5,000 and so
indicate on the verdict sheet/the State contends the value of the property or services
is greater than $10,000 and is therefore charging Defendant with Theft of Computer
Services - Class D Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the
value of the property or services is greater than $10,000 and so indicate on the verdict
sheet/[if applicable] the State contends Defendant engaged in conduct that created a
risk of serious physical injury to another person, and is therefore charging Defendant
with Theft of Computer Services - Class G Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a
reasonable doubt Defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of serious physical
injury to another person and so indicate on the verdict sheet.]
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
obtain services, software or data without obtaining proper permission.
"Access" means to instruct, communicate with, store data in or retrieve data
from a computer, computer system or computer network.
"Computer" means a programmable, electronic device capable of accepting and
processing data.
"Computer network” means a set of related devices connected to a computer by
communications facilities; a complex of two (2) or more computers, including related
devices, connected by communications facilities; or the communications transmission
facilities and devices used to interconnect computational equipment, along with
associated control mechanisms.
"Computer system" means a computer, its software, related equipment and
communications facilities, if any, and includes computer networks.
"Data" means information of any kind in any form, including computer
software.
"Property" means anything of value, including data.
“Value” means the market value of the property or services at the time and place
of the offense, or if that cannot be easily determined, the cost of replacing the property
or services within a reasonable time after the crime occurred.
[if applicable]
["Serious physical injury" means any physical injury which creates a substantial
risk of death, or which causes serious and prolonged disfigurement, prolonged
impairment of health, or prolonged loss or impairment of the function of any bodily
organ.]
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
3d18300269f7018b4308c14e0104bd7feedc4d01f1fde99f76712cf5e5cacbcd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.