DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.932
Unauthorized Access to a Computer System
UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO A COMPUTER SYSTEM
In order to find Defendant guilty of Unauthorized Access to a Computer
System, you must find the State has proved the following three (3) elements beyond a
reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant accessed, or caused to be accessed, a computer system;
(2) Defendant was not authorized to access, or cause access to, the computer
system;
(3) Defendant acted knowingly.
In this case, [the State concedes the value of the property or services is less than
$1,500. No further proof regarding the value of the property or services is needed and
the correct offense is Unauthorized Access to a Computer System - Class A
Misdemeanor/the State contends the value of the property or services is at least $1,500
and is therefore charging Defendant with Unauthorized Access to a Computer System
- Class G Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value of the
property or services is greater than $1,500 and so indicate on the verdict sheet/the
State contends the value of the property or services is greater than $5,000 and is
therefore charging Defendant with Unauthorized Access to a Computer System - Class
E Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value of the
property or services is greater than $5,000 and so indicate on the verdict sheet/the
State contends the value of the property or services is greater than $10,000 and is
therefore charging Defendant with Unauthorized Access to a Computer System - Class
D Felony. Therefore, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value of the
property or services is greater than $10,000 and so indicate on the verdict sheet/[if
applicable] the State contends Defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of
serious physical injury to another person, and is therefore charging Defendant with
Unauthorized Access to a Computer System - Class G Felony. Therefore, you must
find beyond a reasonable doubt Defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of
serious physical injury to another person and so indicate on the verdict sheet.]
“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware Defendant’s conduct was
unauthorized.
"Access" means to instruct, communicate with, store data in or retrieve data
from a computer, computer system or computer network.
"Computer" means a programmable, electronic device capable of accepting and
processing data.
"Computer network” means a set of related devices connected to a computer by
communications facilities; a complex of two (2) or more computers, including related
devices, connected by communications facilities; or the communications transmission
facilities and devices used to interconnect computational equipment, along with
associated control mechanisms.
"Computer system" means a computer, its software, related equipment and
communications facilities, if any, and includes computer networks.
"Data" means information of any kind in any form, including computer
software.
"Property" means anything of value, including data.
“Value” means the market value of the property or services at the time and place
of the offense, or if that cannot be easily determined, the cost of replacing the property
or services within a reasonable time after the crime occurred.
[if applicable]
["Serious physical injury" means any physical injury which creates a substantial
risk of death, or which causes serious and prolonged disfigurement, prolonged
impairment of health, or prolonged loss or impairment of the function of any bodily
organ.]
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
83381adc05bfc688ac3c75853ca1443b9871a1ee46ca23d374fb5a29bf994b2b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.