DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.925(a)
Invasion of Video Privacy
INVASION OF VIDEO PRIVACY
In order to find Defendant guilty of Invasion of Video Privacy, you must find
the State has proved the following three (3) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant rented or sold videotapes;
(2) Defendant wrongfully disclosed a listing of videotapes purchased or rented;
and
(3) Defendant acted intentionally or knowingly.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
wrongfully disclose a listing of videotapes purchased or rented by another.
“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware Defendant was wrongfully disclosing
a list of videotapes purchased or rented by another.
"Wrongfully disclosed" means any publication that occurs in any circumstances
in which the person who rented or bought a videotape has an expectation of privacy.
"Publication" means distribution to someone other than the protected person.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
260a0f842cba054ef2a4581eba062785fd4f03d45ba50a58b2159bfbffe79afb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.