DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.903A(a)
Reencoder and Scanning Devices [Scanning Device]
REENCODER AND SCANNING DEVICES
In order to find Defendant guilty of Unlawful Use of a Scanning Device, you
must find the State has proved the following three (3) elements beyond a reasonable
doubt:
(1) Defendant possessed or used a scanning device to access information
encoded on the computer chip or magnetic strip of a payment card without
permission; and
(2) Defendant intended to defraud; and
(3) Defendant acted intentionally or knowingly.
“Defraud” means to acquire a gain or advantage by fraud.
“Fraud” means an intentional perversion, misrepresentation or concealment of
truth.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
possess or use the scanning device
“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware Defendant possessed or used the
scanning device.
“Scanning device” means a scanner, reader, or any other electronic device that
is used to access, read, scan, obtain, memorize or store, temporarily or permanently,
information encoded on the computer chip or magnetic strip or stripe of a payment
card.
“Payment Card” means a credit card, debit card, or any other card that is issued
to an authorized user and that allows the user to obtain, purchase, or receive goods,
services, money, or anything else of value.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
a50bae2ba4730575e79826db81a3445b197c99051b3e55cdc89bef0f469de76e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.