Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.903A(a)

Reencoder and Scanning Devices [Scanning Device]

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

REENCODER AND SCANNING DEVICES

In order to find Defendant guilty of Unlawful Use of a Scanning Device, you

must find the State has proved the following three (3) elements beyond a reasonable

doubt:

(1) Defendant possessed or used a scanning device to access information

encoded on the computer chip or magnetic strip of a payment card without

permission; and

(2) Defendant intended to defraud; and

(3) Defendant acted intentionally or knowingly.

“Defraud” means to acquire a gain or advantage by fraud.

“Fraud” means an intentional perversion, misrepresentation or concealment of

truth.

“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to

possess or use the scanning device

“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware Defendant possessed or used the

scanning device.

“Scanning device” means a scanner, reader, or any other electronic device that

is used to access, read, scan, obtain, memorize or store, temporarily or permanently,

information encoded on the computer chip or magnetic strip or stripe of a payment

card.

“Payment Card” means a credit card, debit card, or any other card that is issued

to an authorized user and that allows the user to obtain, purchase, or receive goods,

services, money, or anything else of value.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
a50bae2ba4730575e79826db81a3445b197c99051b3e55cdc89bef0f469de76e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.