DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.861(b)(2)b
Forgery in the Second Degree [Filed with Public Office]
FORGERY IN THE SECOND DEGREE
In order to find Defendant guilty of Forgery in the Second Degree, you must
find the State has proved the following four (4) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant meant to defraud, deceive, or injure another person;
(2) Defendant altered ,completed, executed, authenticated, issued or
transferred another person’s written instrument without that other person’s authority;
(3) The written instrument was, or purported to be, a public record, or an
instrument filed (or required to be filed) with a public office or public servant; and
(4) Defendant acted intentionally.
“Defraud” means to acquire a gain or advantage by fraud.
“Fraud” means an intentional perversion, misrepresentation or concealment of
truth.
“Intentionally” means Defendant consciously altered, completed, executed,
authenticated, issued or transferred another person’s written instrument without that
other person’s authority.
“Public servant” means any officer or employee of the State or any political
subdivision thereof, including legislators and judges, and any person participating as
juror, advisor or consultant in performing a governmental function. The term does
not include witnesses. This definition includes persons who are candidates for office
or who have been elected to office, but who have not yet assumed office.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
a618589c99a1fb22f7f01a891820e86fef79bedbd3fa0fa69e49a77d66194c44
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.