DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.848
Misapplication of Property
MISAPPLICATION OF PROPERTY
In order to find Defendant guilty of Misapplication of Property, you must find
the State has proved the following five (5) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant was in possession of the personal property of another person;
(2) Possession was the result of an agreement that the property would be
returned to the other person at a future time;
(3) Defendant sold, leased, loaned, pledged, pawned or encumbered the
property without the other person’s consent;
(4) Defendant’s action created a risk that the other person would be unable to
recover the property, or would suffer a monetary loss; and
(5) Defendant acted knowingly.
[The State contends that the value of the property is $1,500 or more. Therefore,
in order to find Defendant guilty, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value
of the property is $1,500 or more.
“Value” means the market value of the property at the time and place of the
crime, or if that cannot be easily determined, the cost of replacing the property within a
reasonable time after the crime occurred.]
“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware of the nature of the agreement with
the other person; was aware that the other person had not agreed to Defendant’s
misapplication of the property; and was aware that it was practically certain that the
other person would be unable to recover the property or would suffer a monetary loss.
"Personal property of another" means property, other than land, that belongs
to someone other than Defendant and Defendant does not have permission to take.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
2df5b0570409445a8330d657f7c89fd784bb9c3d1f21aa540c2dd2588327152f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.