DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.843
Theft by False Pretense
THEFT BY FALSE PRETENSE
In order to find Defendant guilty of Theft by False Pretense, you must find the
State has proved the following four (4) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant obtained property of another;
(2) Defendant created or reinforced a false impression, or prevented the other
person from acquiring information, which adversely affected that person’s judgment
about the transaction;
(3) Defendant intended to appropriate the property for Defendant’s own use;
and
(4) Defendant acted intentionally.
[The State contends that the value of the property is $1,500 or more. Therefore,
in order to find Defendant guilty, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value
of the property is $1,500 or more.
“Value” means the market value of the property at the time and place of the
crime, or if that cannot be easily determined, the cost of replacing the property within a
reasonable time after the crime occurred.]
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
create a false impression in another person’s mind about the transaction.
"Appropriate" means to exercise control over someone else’s property
permanently or for such an extended period of time so as to obtain a major part of its
economic value.
"Property of another" means property that belongs to someone other than
Defendant and that Defendant does not have permission to take.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
796dae5ebc199b7d701527ff9cad0e047268776d1ca770fb1a73e389f9df6498
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.