DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.842
Theft [Lost or Mislaid Property]
THEFT [LOST OR MISLAID PROPERTY]
In order to find Defendant guilty of Theft, you must find the State has proved
the following four (4) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant exercised control over property of another;
(2) Defendant knew the property had been lost, misplaced, or delivered under
a mistake as to the identity of the recipient, the nature, or the value) of the property;
(3) Defendant did not take reasonable steps to return the property to its owner;
and
(4) Defendant intended to appropriate the property for Defendant’s own use.
[The State contends that the value of the property is $1,500 or more. Therefore,
in order to find Defendant guilty, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt the value
of the property is $1,500 or more.
“Value” means the market value of the property at the time and place of the
crime, or if that cannot be easily determined, the cost of replacing the property within a
reasonable time after the crime occurred.]
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
appropriate someone of property.
"Appropriate" means to exercise control over someone else’s property
permanently or for such an extended period of time so as to obtain a major part of its
economic value.
"Property of another" means property that belongs to someone other than
Defendant and that Defendant does not have permission to take.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
ab4b1a9d4875198a000eefaf4af87f8780e8dd6235146bb0206baf10ff1a83b1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.