Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.828(a)(2)

Possession of Burglar's Tools or Instruments Facilitating Theft [Disabling Security Device]

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

POSSESSION OF BURGLAR'S TOOLS OR INSTRUMENTS

FACILITATING THEFT [DISABLING SECURITY DEVICE]

In order to find Defendant guilty of Possession of Burglar's Tools or

Instruments Facilitating Theft, you must find the State has proved the following two

(2) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) Defendant was in possession of any tool or instrument, commonly used for

committing or facilitating unlocking, overriding, or disabling a security device,

without authorization; and

(2) Defendant intended to use, or knew another person intended to use, the

tool or instrument to unlock, override, or disable a security device, without

authorization.

“In possession” means Defendant possessed the tool or instrument at a time and

place close to the commission of unlocking, overriding, or disabling a security device,

without authorization, or under circumstances not clearly appropriate for the tool or

instrument’s lawful use.

“Possession” means the tool or instrument was in the immediate personal

possession of, or under the immediate control of, Defendant so it was physically

available or accessible during the commission of unlocking, overriding, or disabling

a security device, without authorization.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
931323de511f22f0ade0cd2c6ab782257ca0d7d1c320d25e19421b48ebc04db3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.828(a)(2) — Possession of Bu… · binding.law