Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.820

Trespassing with Intent to Peep or Peer into Window of Another

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

TRESPASSING WITH INTENT TO PEER OR PEEP

INTO THE WINDOW OR DOOR OF ANOTHER

In order to find Defendant guilty of Trespassing With Intent to Peer or Peep,

you must find the State has proved the following five (5) elements beyond a

reasonable doubt:

(1) Defendant entered onto the occupied property of another person;

(2) The property was used as a dwelling;

(3) Defendant intended to peer or peep into a window or door of the dwelling;

(4) Defendant acted in a manner commonly referred to as “Peeping Tom”; and

(5) Defendant acted knowingly.

“Building” is defined as any structure, vehicle or watercraft. When a building

consists of two or more units separately secured or occupied, each unit is considered a

separate building.

“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to

look into a window or door of the dwelling.

“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware Defendant was entering the property

or was certain Defendant would enter the property.

“Dwelling” means a building is usually occupied by a person who lives there

at night.

“Entering property" means Defendant introduced a part of Defendant’s body

or part of an instrument, by whatever means, onto the property.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
c278150b5bd268be258b9e186224ff06b803a19ddc3b8e4c51e14f7a3d734c9e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.