DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.778(2)
Sexual Abuse of a Child by a Person in a Position of Trust, Authority or Supervision [Penetration]
SEXUAL ABUSE OF A CHILD BY A PERSON
IN A POSITION OF TRUST, AUTHORITY
OR SUPERVISION IN THE FIRST DEGREE [PENETRATION]
In order to find Defendant guilty of a Sexual Offender Unlawful Sexual
Conduct Against a Child, you must find the State proved the following four (4)
elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant engaged in sexual penetration with [victim];
(2) Defendant stood in a position of trust, authority, or supervision over the
child, or was a(n) invitee or designee of person who stood in a position of trust,
authority, or supervision over the child;
(3) The child was less than sixteen (16) years of age at the time of the
charged offense; and
(4) Defendant acted intentionally.
It is no defense to the charge of Dangerous Crime Against a Child that
Defendant did not know the child’s age at the time of the crime or reasonably
believed the child had reached their sixteenth (16) birthday or was not younger
than sixteen (16) at the time of the crime.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
engage in sexual penetration with the child.
“Sexual penetration” means: (1) Defendant’s placement of any object inside
the child’s anus or vagina; or (2) Defendant’s placement of Defendant’s genitalia or
any sexual device inside the child’s mouth.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
7f4a48ab359dda889e2efb1ff3e97b2324aac364a45d3dea91ed706021fefd1b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.