DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.776(a)
Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child
CONTINUOUS SEXUAL ABUSE OF A CHILD
In order to find Defendant guilty of Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child,
you must find the State has proved the following five (5) elements beyond a
reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant resided in the same home as the child or had recurring access
to the child;
(2) Defendant engaged in 3 or more sexual acts of sexual conduct with the
child;
(3) The child was less than 18 years of age at the time of the sexual acts;
(4) The sexual acts occurred over a period of time greater than 3 months;
and
(5) Defendant acted intentionally.
It is no defense to the charge of Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child that
Defendant did not know the child’s age at the time of the crime or reasonably
believed the child had reached their eighteenth (18) birthday or was not younger
than eighteen (18) at the time of the crime.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
engage in the identified sexual acts with the child.
“Sexual conduct” under this section is: unlawful sexual conduct in the first
or second degree; rape in the first, second, third or fourth degree; unlawful sexual
conduct against a child by a sex offender; sexual abuse of a child by a person in a
position of trust, authority or supervision in the first or second degree; or sexual
exploitation of a child.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
f297eaa146c87c3af866bd2125e65835c3b9cbfb4cf3b475ccc1937bf2473634
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.