DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.772(a)(2)g
Rape in the Second Degree [Penetration of Victim Under 12 by Defendant 18 or Older]
RAPE IN THE SECOND DEGREE
[PENETRATION OF VICTIM UNDER 12
BY DEFENDANT 18 OR OLDER]
In order to find Defendant guilty of Rape in the Second Degree, you must
find the State has proved the following three (3) elements beyond a reasonable
doubt:
(1) Defendant engaged in sexual penetration with a person;
(2) The person was less than 12 years of age and Defendant was at least 18
years of age at the time; and
(3) Defendant acted intentionally.
By law, a child who has not yet reached their twelfth (12) birthday is
unable to consent to a sexual act under any circumstances.
It is no defense to the charge of Rape in the Second Degree that Defendant
did not know the child’s age at the time of the charged offense, or reasonably
believed the child had reached their twelfth (12)] birthday or was not younger than
twelve (12) at the time.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
sexually penetrate the child.
“Sexual penetration” means: (1) Defendant’s placement of any object inside
the child’s anus or vagina; or (2) Defendant’s placement of Defendant’s genitalia or
any sexual device inside the child’s mouth.
“Object” means any item, device, instrument, substance or any part of the
body. It does not mean a medical instrument used by a licensed medical doctor or
nurse for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
c19224afa16dd01cd30e5187a7c612ed212df1cf81342d6e724ae3a795dae620
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.