DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.768
Unlawful Sexual Contact in the Second Degree
UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONTACT IN THE SECOND DEGREE
In order to find Defendant guilty of Unlawful Sexual Contact in the Second
Degree, you must find the State has proved the following three (3) elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant [had sexual contact with a person/caused a person to have
sexual contact with (Defendant/another person)];
(2) The person was less than 18 years of age at the time of the charged
offense; and
(3) Defendant acted intentionally.
It is no defense to the charge of Unlawful Sexual Contact in the Second
Degree that Defendant did not know the person’s age at the time of the unlawful
sexual contact, or reasonably believed the person had reached their sixteenth
birthday or was not younger than sixteen (16) at the time of the unlawful sexual
contact.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
[have sexual contact with (victim)/cause (victim) to have sexual contact with
Defendant/cause (victim) to have sexual contact with a another person].
"Sexual contact" means Defendant intentionally touched a person’s anus,
breast, buttocks or genitalia; or Defendant intentionally touched a person’s with
Defendant’s anus, breast, buttocks or genitalia, where a reasonable person, under
the circumstances, would find the touching was intended to be sexual in nature.
“Sexual contact” includes touching through clothing. Sexual gratification is not
required.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
a21cde3f09ea3ff99858d514692cfe808ed0b886e762adf90e08bae792d3c296
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.