DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1471(f)
Prohibited Acts
PROHIBITED ACTS
In order to find Defendant guilty of Prohibited Acts, you must find the State
proved following three (3) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant [placed/(increased/decreased)a wager/determined the course
of play] [after acquiring knowledge/aiding another to acquire knowledge] for the
purpose of [(placing/increasing/ decreasing a wager/determining the course of
play] of the outcome of [a table game/any event affecting the outcome of the
game/the subject of the wager];
(2) Knowledge was not available to other players; and
(3) Defendant acted [intentionally/knowingly.]
.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
place, increase or decrease a bet or help another player to do the same after
gaining knowledge not available to other players.
“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware Defendant was placing,
increasing or decreasing a bet or help another player to do the same after gaining
knowledge not available to other players.
"Table game" shall mean any game played with cards, dice or any
mechanical, electromechanical or electronic device or machine (excluding video
lottery machines) for money, credit or any representative of value, including, but
not limited to, baccarat, blackjack, twenty-one, poker, craps, roulette, keno, bingo,
wheel of fortune or any variation of these games, whether or not similar in design
or operation.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
b72182e03c281fcb0aa0518126b32abe3998c299941a1a3eb9e976a71aa03de1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.