Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1458(a)(1)e

Removing a Firearm From the Possession of a Law Enforcement Officer

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

REMOVING A FIREARM FROM THE POSSESSION OF A

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

In order to find Defendant guilty of Removing a Firearm From the

Possession of a Law Enforcement Officer, you must find the State proved

following four (4) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) Defendant [removed/attempted to remove] a [firearm/disabling

chemical spray/baton/ deadly weapon] from the possession of [victim];

(2) Defendant [knew/had reason to know] [victim] was employed as

licensed armored car guard;

(3) [Victim] was acting within the course and scope of [victim’s]

employment; and

(4) Defendant acted [knowingly/recklessly].

"Firearm" means any weapon from which a shot, projectile, or other object

may be discharged by force of combustion, explosive, gas and/or mechanical

means, whether the weapon is operable or inoperable, loaded or unloaded. The

term does not include a BB gun.

“Deadly weapon" is defined to include: firearm, bomb, knife of any sort

(other than an ordinary pocket knife carried in a closed position), switchblade

knife, billy, blackjack, bludgeon, metal knuckles, slingshot, razor, bicycle chain,

ice pick or any dangerous instrument which a person used, or tried to use, to cause

death or serious physical injury. For the purpose of this definition, an ordinary

pocket knife is a folding knife with a blade no longer than 3 inches.

“Knowingly” means Defendant knew or was aware Defendant was

removing a firearm from a licensed armored car guard.

“Recklessly” means Defendant was aware of and consciously disregarded a

substantial and unjustifiable risk Defendant would [remove/attempt to remove]

[weapon] from a licensed armored car guard. The State must demonstrate the risk

was of such a nature and degree Defendant’s disregard of it was a gross deviation

from the standard of conduct a reasonable person would observe under the same

circumstances.

“Disabling chemical spray” includes mace, tear gas, pepper spray or any

other mixture containing quantities thereof, or any other aerosol spray or any

liquid, gaseous or solid substance capable of producing temporary physical

discomfort, disability or injury through being vaporized or otherwise dispersed in

the air, or any canister, container or device designed or intended to carry, store or

disperse such aerosol spray or such gas or solid.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
fb2176a8cce290ffe51df6090a76b92c1c6f6bb36fd07625a2d23d1994205e72
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1458(a)(1)e — Removing a Fir… · binding.law