Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1455

Engaging in Firearms Transaction on Behalf of Another

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

ENGAGING IN FIREARMS TRANSACTION ON BEHALF OF ANOTHER

In order to find Defendant guilty of Engaging in Firearms Transaction on

Behalf of Another, you must find the State proved following four (4) elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) Defendant [purchased/obtained] a firearm;

(2) Defendant acted [on behalf of (person) not qualified to legally

(purchase/own/possess) a firearm/with the purpose of (selling/giving/transferring)

a firearm to (person) not qualified to legally (purchase/own/possess) a firearm;]

(3) [Person], was not legally qualified to [purchase/own/possess] a firearm

in this State because [state reason]; and

(4) Defendant acted [intentionally/knowingly].

"Firearm" means any weapon from which a shot, projectile, or other object

may be discharged by force of combustion, explosive, gas and/or mechanical

means, whether the weapon is operable or inoperable, loaded or unloaded. The

term does not include a BB gun.

“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to

engage in a firearm transaction on behalf of person not qualified to legally

purchase, own or possess a firearm.

“Knowingly” means Defendant knew or was aware Defendant was engaging

in a firearm transaction on behalf of person not qualified to legally purchase, own

or possess a firearm.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
f9f62746605afd56eb2cf632b81536701db82c7b51e3dba9b281cf90c4d0a757
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.