DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1353(2)
Promoting Prostitution in the First Degree
PROMOTING PROSTITUTION IN THE FIRST DEGREE
In order to find Defendant guilty of Promoting Prostitution in the First
Degree, you must find the State proved following two (2) elements beyond a
reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant [advanced/profited from] the prostitution of a person less
than 16 years old; and
(2) Defendant acted knowingly.
“Knowingly” means Defendant knew or was aware (prostitute) was less
than 16 years old.
Defendant "advances prostitution" when Defendant knowingly causes or
assists another person to commit or engage in prostitution, procures or solicits
patrons for prostitution, provides persons or premises for prostitution purposes,
operates or assists in the operation of a house of prostitution or a prostitution
enterprise, or engages in any other conduct designed to establish, assist or
facilitate an act or enterprise of prostitution.
Defendant "profits from prostitution" when Defendant, acting as other than
a prostitute, receives compensation for rendering prostitution services and, under
an agreement or understanding with another person, participates or is to participate
in the proceeds of the prostitution activity. A person does not advance or profit
from prostitution by either patronizing a prostitute or by receiving compensation for
personally engaging in prostitution activities.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
7d8433daf0adeff04655b832c9da9811251fd5ff5275ec193b73123180313425
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.