DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1313(b)(2)
Malicious Interference of Emergency Telephone Calls
MALICIOUS INTERFERENCE OF EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
In order to find Defendant guilty of Malicious Interference of Emergency
Communications, you must find the State has proved the following three (3)
elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant made repeated nonemergency communications to any 911 or
other emergency communications center;
(2) Defendant knew the nonemergency communications would likely
disrupt the operations of such emergency communications center; and
(2) Defendant acted intentionally.
“Emergency communications center” means any public or private facility or
entity which accepts emergency communications for the purpose of notifying,
dispatching, directing, or coordinating law enforcement, fire, medical, paramedic,
ambulance, utility, or other public safety personnel.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
c7736da201ec317fdb96691357947cca14476822754e8a8aff5313a2a3185ade
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.