DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1264
Bribing a Juror
BRIBING A JUROR
In order to find Defendant guilty of Bribing a Juror, you must find the State
has proved the following three (3) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant offered, conferred, or agreed to confer a benefit upon a juror;
(2) Defendant had an agreement or understanding with the juror that the
juror’s vote, opinion, judgment, decision or other action as a juror would be
influenced; and
(3) Defendant acted intentionally or knowingly.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
engage in bribing a juror.
“Knowingly” means Defendant knew or was aware Defendant was engaging
in bribing a juror.
“Juror” means any person who has received notice of a summons to appear
for jury service.
"Benefit" means a gain or advantage for the recipient or anything the
recipient considers to be a gain or advantage. The term includes a gain or
advantage conferred on the recipient’s behalf or at the recipient’s request upon a
third person.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
66d8d02a899707027f78b864a8f058e661cd595b6fd7463de8de9daa8103a6a2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.