Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1231

Retraction of False Statement [Affirmative Defense]

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

RETRACTION OF FALSE STATEMENT [AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE]

In this case, Defendant has asserted the affirmative defense of Retraction of

a False Statement to the charge of Perjury. In order to establish this affirmative

defense, Defendant must prove each of the following three (3) elements by a

preponderance of the evidence:

(1) Defendant retracted the false statement in the course of the proceeding

in which it was made;

(2) Defendant retracted before the false statement substantially affected the

proceeding; and

(3) The retraction occurred before it had become obvious the falsity of the

statement was or would have been exposed.

Proof by a preponderance of the evidence means proof something is more

likely than not. It means certain evidence, when compared to the evidence opposed

to it, has the more convincing force and makes you believe something is more likely

true than not. Preponderance of the evidence does not depend on the number of

witnesses. If the evidence supporting the existence of the defense is evenly

balanced, then Defendant has not proved the existence of the defense by a

preponderance of the evidence, and you must find against Defendant on that point.

The state has no burden to present any evidence on this matter.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
aa32e1d49d897358abc08e5fbd28d1d5dfa3a92e229a0b47dd37c83b834621e5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1231 — Retraction of False S… · binding.law