DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1212(3)
Profiteering
PROFITEERING
In order to find Defendant guilty of Profiteering, you must find the State has
proved the following four (4) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant was a public servant at the time of the offense;
(2) Defendant acted in [contemplation of (Defendant’s/governmental
entity) official action/ reliance on information to which Defendant had access in an
official capacity and which had not been made public];
(3) Defendant aided another person to [acquire a monetary interest in
(property/transaction/ enterprise)/(wager or speculate)] on the basis of official
[action/information] with the intention of gaining a personal benefit; and
(4) Defendant acted intentionally or knowingly.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
engage in profiteering.
“Knowingly” means Defendant knew or was aware Defendant was engaging
in profiteering.
"Personal benefit" means a personal gain or advantage for the recipient or
anything the recipient considers to be a gain or advantage. The term includes a
gain or advantage conferred on Defendant’s behalf or at Defendant’s request upon
a third person.
"Public servant" means any officer or employee of the State or any political
subdivision of the State. The term includes legislators, judges, jurors, advisors or
consultant performing governmental functions, candidates for office or candidates
who have been elected but have not yet assumed office. The term does not include
witnesses.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
0c4f2cb5f5b1d3b9c0ba9c4258c2d55d7b7221ed89364fe8912c5c80183b998e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.