DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1211(3)
Official Misconduct
OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT
In order to find Defendant guilty of Official Misconduct, you must find the
State has proved the following four (4) elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant was a public servant at the time of the offense;
(2) Defendant obtained personal benefit from, or caused harm to, a person;
(3) Defendant performed an official function in a way intended to benefit
Defendant’s own property or financial interests, under circumstances in which
Defendant’s actions were not reasonably justified; and
(4) Defendant acted intentionally.
“Intentionally” means it was Defendant’s conscious objective or purpose to
engage in official misconduct.
"Harm" means any loss, disadvantage, or injury not sanctioned by law. The
term includes any loss, disadvantage, or injury not sanctioned by law to a third
person.
"Personal benefit" means a personal gain or advantage for the recipient or
anything the recipient considers to be a gain or advantage. The term includes a gain
or advantage conferred on Defendant’s behalf or at Defendant’s request upon a
third person.
"Public servant" means any officer or employee of the State or any political
subdivision of the State. The term includes legislators, judges, jurors, advisors or
consultant performing governmental functions, candidates for office or candidates
who have been elected but have not yet assumed office. The term does not include
witnesses.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
caf5db45b7bd4669476de0084e20df6c3b1dc80a6645e2119d731559507854e7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.