Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1205

Giving Unlawful Gratuities

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

GIVING UNLAWFUL GRATUITIES

In order to find Defendant guilty of Giving Unlawful Gratuities, you must

find the State has proved the following four (4) elements beyond a reasonable

doubt:

(1) Defendant offered, conferred, or agreed to confer a personal benefit

upon another person;

(2) The person was a public servant at the time;

(3) The personal benefit offered or conferred was for conduct the public

servant was required or authorized to perform, and for which the public servant

was not entitled to any special or additional compensation; and

(4) Defendant acted knowingly.

“Knowingly” means Defendant knew or was aware Defendant was engaging

in giving unlawful gratuities.

"Personal benefit" means a personal gain or advantage for the recipient or

anything the recipient considers to be a gain or advantage. The term includes a

gain or advantage conferred on the recipient’s behalf or at the recipient’s request

upon a third person.

"Public servant" means any officer or employee of the State or any political

subdivision of the State. The term includes legislators, judges, jurors, advisors or

consultant performing governmental functions, candidates for office or candidates

who have been elected but have not yet assumed office. The term does not include

witnesses.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
05852a8a829b5a007dbd1ac4d699fa02d3564c004c681ece738690f6ea396cbc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.