Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1109(5)

Dealing in Child Pornography

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

DEALING IN CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

In order to find Defendant guilty of Dealing in Child Pornography, you must

find the State has proved the following two (2) elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (

1 ) D e f e n d a n t

[advertised/promoted/presented/described/transmitted/distributed] any visual

[depiction/exhibition/display/performance] with intent to [create/convey] the

impression such visual [depiction/exhibition/display/performance] contains a

depiction of a child engaging in a [prohibited sexual act/simulation of a prohibited

sexual act]; and

(2) Defendant acted knowingly.

“Knowingly” means Defendant knew or was aware of the nature of

Defendant’s actions.

“Child” means any individual under the age of 18.

[For the purposes of § 1109 of this Title, “child” shall also mean any individual

intended by Defendant to appear to be 14 years of age or less.]

“Prohibited sexual act" includes: sexual intercourse; anal intercourse;

masturbation; bestiality; sadism; masochism; fellatio; cunnilingus; nudity, if such

nudity is depicted to sexually stimulate or gratify any individual who may view the

depiction; sexual contact; lascivious exhibition of any child’s genitals or pubic area;

or any other act which is intended to be a depiction or simulation of any of the above.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
c889efa4ba72f20ada4d5288909bae6ac934d1e1b64be568fc97842a13f76e98
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.