DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1102(a)(6)
Endangering the Welfare of a Child [Presence of Child During Drug Offense]
ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD
[PRESENCE OF CHILD DURING DRUG OFFENSE]
In order to find Defendant guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child, you
must find the State has proved the following [four/five] [(4)/(5)] elements beyond a
reasonable doubt:
(1) Defendant committed [drug offense] in a dwelling;
(2) [child] was in the dwelling;
(3) [child] was a child at the time the charged offense occurred; and
(4) Defendant acted knowingly.
[where appropriate]
[and
(5) Defendant’s acts resulted in the (death of/serious physical injury to)
(child).]
With respect to element 5, the State is not required to prove Defendant’s state
of mind or responsibility for causing (child’s) (death/serious injury).
The elements of [drug offense] are [list elements].
"Serious physical injury" means any physical injury which creates a substantial
risk of death, or which causes serious and prolonged disfigurement, prolonged
impairment of health, or prolonged loss or impairment of the function of any bodily
organ.]
“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware a child less than 18 years of age was
in the dwelling when the offense occurred.
“Dwelling” means a building is usually occupied by a person who lives there
at night.
“Child” means any individual under the age of 18.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- crim-2022-03-14
- Content hash
46e9c9fb327bf87386332c98c2b3e6c99ab2b81b56160769cb40c7441796edd4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.