Bindinglaw

DE · jury_instructions

Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1102(a)(6)

Endangering the Welfare of a Child [Presence of Child During Drug Offense]

activein force · 2022-03-14 – presentcompiled-edition

ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD

[PRESENCE OF CHILD DURING DRUG OFFENSE]

In order to find Defendant guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child, you

must find the State has proved the following [four/five] [(4)/(5)] elements beyond a

reasonable doubt:

(1) Defendant committed [drug offense] in a dwelling;

(2) [child] was in the dwelling;

(3) [child] was a child at the time the charged offense occurred; and

(4) Defendant acted knowingly.

[where appropriate]

[and

(5) Defendant’s acts resulted in the (death of/serious physical injury to)

(child).]

With respect to element 5, the State is not required to prove Defendant’s state

of mind or responsibility for causing (child’s) (death/serious injury).

The elements of [drug offense] are [list elements].

"Serious physical injury" means any physical injury which creates a substantial

risk of death, or which causes serious and prolonged disfigurement, prolonged

impairment of health, or prolonged loss or impairment of the function of any bodily

organ.]

“Knowingly” means Defendant was aware a child less than 18 years of age was

in the dwelling when the offense occurred.

“Dwelling” means a building is usually occupied by a person who lives there

at night.

“Child” means any individual under the age of 18.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
crim-2022-03-14
Content hash
46e9c9fb327bf87386332c98c2b3e6c99ab2b81b56160769cb40c7441796edd4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Del. P.J.I. Crim. No. 11.1102(a)(6) — Endangering the… · binding.law