DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Civ. § 9.15
Revocation of Acceptance
REVOCATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF GOODS
One of the buyer’s remedies for breach of express warranty is known as
“revocation of acceptance.” To effectively revoke [his/her/its] acceptance of the
goods, [buyer’s name] must establish all of the following elements:
(1) when the product was delivered, it had a [non-conformity / defect] that
could not reasonably have been discovered by [buyer’s name];
(2) the [non-conformity / defect] substantially impaired the value of the
product to [buyer’s name], in light of [his/her/its] needs and circumstances and
considering whether a reasonable person would consider the value of the product to
be impaired under these circumstances;
(3) [Buyer’s name] notified either [defendant’s name] or one of
[his/her/its] agents that [he/she/it] did not want to keep the product;
(4) the notification occurred within a reasonable time after [buyer’s name]
discovered or should have discovered the [non-conformity / defect]; and
(5) the revocation occurred before there was any substantial change in the
product’s condition that was not caused by the [non-conformity / defect]. In this
regard, a buyer may work with a seller in attempting to have the [non-conformity /
defect] repaired but may then timely revoke acceptance if the [non-conformity /
defect] is not satisfactorily cured. If you find that [buyer’s name] has established all
of the above elements by a preponderance of the evidence, then you must find that
[buyer’s name] effectively revoked [his/her/its] acceptance of the product.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- civ-2025-10-22
- Content hash
99c70219d72cf92495495b2406f4e4e27d03e113bf34389d2250c6c720599fc8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.