DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Civ. § 6.6
Commonly Cited Motor Vehicle Statutory Provisions
COMMONLY CITED MOTOR VEHICLE STATUTES
[Plaintiff / defendant’s name] charges [defendant / plaintiff’s name] with
violation of the following statutes. If you find that a party has violated a statutory
provision, then the violation automatically amounts to negligence by that party.
{ If applicable, insert after the relevant statute to be cited}:
Before the violation of any traffic statute can be determined, it must first be
established whether, under the circumstances at the time of the accident, an ordinary,
prudent motorist would or should have been able to ascertain the duty to [describe
statutory duty]. If an ordinary, prudent driver would not have been able to ascertain
this duty, then a technical violation of a motor vehicle statute will be excused, and
there is no negligence as a matter of law. If an ordinary, prudent driver could or
should have been able to [describe statutory duty], then a violation of this motor
vehicle statute by [defendant / plaintiff’s name] automatically amounts to
negligence.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- civ-2025-10-22
- Content hash
e0d1a47d78515ac781089aef70dbd65f1e95b57e4b8b78b5e46702784bee52d9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.