DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Civ. § 23.9
Credibility of Witnesses – Conflicting Testimony
CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES –-
WEIGHING CONFLICTING TESTIMONY
You are the sole judges of each witness’s credibility. That includes the parties.
You should consider each witness’s means of knowledge; strength of memory;
opportunity to observe; how reasonable or unreasonable the testimony is; whether it
is consistent or inconsistent; whether it has been contradicted; the witnesses’ biases,
prejudices, or interests; the witnesses’ manner or demeanor on the witness stand; and
all circumstances that, according to the evidence, could affect the credibility of the
testimony.
If you find the testimony to be contradictory, you must try to reconcile it, if
reasonably possible, so as to make one harmonious story of it all. But if you cannot
do this, then it is your duty and privilege to believe the testimony that, in your
judgment, is most believable and disregard any testimony that, in your judgment, is
not believable.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- civ-2025-10-22
- Content hash
7b81c9278efccc6fcf297b5b3694aad69085663d90cb11ec6ba82e4a9bc2172a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.