DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Civ. § 22.19
Settling Co-defendant
SETTLING CO-DEFENDANT
When this case began, [plaintiff’s name] alleged in the complaint that the joint
negligence of [non-settling-defendant’s name] and [settling-defendant’s name]
was the proximate cause of [plaintiff’s name]’s injuries. [Before / during] this trial,
[settling-defendant’s name] reached a settlement with [plaintiff’s name] on all of
[plaintiff’s name]’s claims against [him/her]. Your deliberations, however, must
determine whether [non-settling-defendant’s name], [settling-defendant’s name],
or both of them were negligent and whether that negligence was the proximate cause
of the injuries to [plaintiff’s name].
[Non-settling-defendant’s name] has asserted a cross-claim against [settling-defendant’s name], asserting that [his/her] negligence was the proximate cause of
the injuries to [plaintiff’s name]. You must determine whether either or both of
[defendants’ names] were negligent, and whether that negligence proximately
caused [plaintiff’s name]’s injuries. If you find that either one or both of the
defendants were liable of negligence and that the negligence was a proximate cause
of the injuries to [plaintiff’s name], you must then determine the amount of damages
you should award to [plaintiff’s name] to compensate [him/her] fairly and
reasonably for [his/her] injuries.
{If there was a monetary settlement, add the following}:
In computing these damages, do not be concerned with the fact that a settlement
was made with [plaintiff’s name] or speculate why a settlement was reached. You
also must not speculate about what [plaintiff’s name] may have or should have
received in that settlement. If you find from the evidence that both [defendants’
names] were guilty of negligence proximately causing [plaintiff’s name]’s injuries,
then you should award damages to compensate [plaintiff’s name] for [his/her] fair
and reasonable damages in full. In addition, you should apportion your verdict to
attribute a percentage of negligence to each defendant in a percentage range from
zero to 100. You will be provided with a verdict form to guide you in this process.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- civ-2025-10-22
- Content hash
8845537a7a785b674ac1d025c2ded9a2ab1ea0c906db81fd53edbd36351b65a8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.