DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Civ. § 22.17
Damages – Fraud
DAMAGES - FRAUD: BENEFIT OF THE BARGAIN RULE
If you find that [defendant’s name] committed fraud, then [plaintiff’s name]
is entitled to damages that will put [him/her/it] in the same financial position that
would have existed had [defendant’s name]’s fraudulent representation been true.
Your award should reflect the difference in value between the actual value of
[describe the transaction] and the value represented by [defendant’s name].
{If applicable}: This goal can also be achieved by awarding (plaintiff’s name) the
cost of putting the (item of the fraud) in the condition in which it was represented
to be — that is, the cost of repairs.
DAMAGES - FRAUD: OUT-OF-POCKET MEASURE OF LOSS
If you find that [defendant’s name] committed fraud, then [plaintiff’s name]
is entitled to damages that will give [him/her/it] the difference in value between
what [he/she/it] paid and the actual value of [describe the item fraudulently
represented]. This award of damages is intended to put [plaintiff’s name] back in
the same financial position [he/she/it] occupied before the transaction took place.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- civ-2025-10-22
- Content hash
df087530384bd2f0f351292c2ae78d2a5891e1efcdec37f1093b8035ef1f3502
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.