DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Civ. § 19.8
Contract Defenses – Mutual Mistake
MUTUAL MISTAKE
If the parties to a contract are both mistaken about an important fact, and if the
mistake involves a basic assumption of the agreement and not merely an incidental
matter, then the contract may be voided. An important fact is one that, in light of
the surrounding circumstances, would affect the decision-making of the parties. The
party complaining of the mistake must demonstrate a reasonable degree of diligence
in discovering the necessary facts before the agreement was made. Finally, the
mistake itself must be shown by clear and convincing evidence.
You may find that the contract at issue is not enforceable only if you find:
(1) that [plaintiff’s name] has shown by clear and convincing evidence that
there was a mistake of fact about [describe the alleged mistake of fact];
(2) that the mistake of fact was important to the agreement between
[plaintiff’s name] and [defendant’s name]; and
(3) that [plaintiff’s name] made a reasonable effort to discover the correct
facts before entering the contract.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- civ-2025-10-22
- Content hash
d6f9a8988fee0d9587725fa5c4418d92a28cec1addbebc2b750ff2290f1f9477
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.