DE · jury_instructions
Del. P.J.I. Civ. § 11.17
Defamation – Defense of a Conditional Privilege
DEFAMATION – DEFENSE OF A CONDITIONAL PRIVILEGE
I have determined, as a matter of law, that [defendant’s name] was privileged
to publish false and defamatory communications. But a person with this privilege
may not abuse it. You must determine whether [defendant’s name] abused
[his/her/its] privilege. If you find that [he/she/it] abused this privilege, you may
return a verdict in favor of [plaintiff’s name] and against [defendant’s name].
The privilege that applies to [defendant’s name] is [state privilege]. This
privilege is abused, however, if [defendant’s name] made or published the false and
defamatory communication intentionally, that is, with knowledge of its falsity; or
recklessly, that is, by disregarding whether it was true or false. The privilege is also
abused when asserted outside [defendant’s name]’s performance of [his/her/its]
duties or functions that give rise to the privilege.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.delaware.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-23
- Edition
- civ-2025-10-22
- Content hash
77c152cbf9b8a1f3ab95a9b8783279bea0b55bdb27b3c1de32ed0cd6aa9950ac
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.