Bindinglaw

DC · rules

D.C. Super. Ct. Neg. R. 26

Revocation of Protective Supervision or Modification of the Terms of

activein force · 2017-05-10 – presentact-effective-date

Protective Supervision and Finding of Violation of Terms of Protective Supervision

(a) Filing of motion. The District of Columbia or guardian ad litem/counsel for the child

may file a Motion for Finding of Violation of Terms of Protective Supervision and for

Revocation of Protective Supervision or a Motion for Finding of Violation of Terms of

Protective Supervision and for Modification of the Terms of Protective Supervision, or a

judicial officer may initiate revocation proceedings sua sponte, in any case in which a child

is under the jurisdiction of the court pursuant to an order of disposition entered in

accordance with Rule 25 and has been released under protective supervision in

accordance with that order, and one of the following occurs:

(1) The child or a sibling is subsequently taken into custody by a law enforcement

officer pursuant to D.C. Code § 16-2309(a)(3), (4) or (6) or 16-2306(c) and Rule 4(a);

(2) It appears to an investigating law enforcement officer or social worker or to the

guardian ad litem/counsel for the child that there are grounds for taking the child into

custody under D.C. Code §§ 16-2309(a)(3), (4) or (6) or 16-2306(c) and Rule 4(b);

(3) Facts and circumstances occurring or newly discovered subsequent to the

fact-finding hearing or disposition hearing would cause the child to be a neglected child

within the meaning of D.C. Code § 16-2301 and as a result of the occurrence or discovery

of these facts and circumstances it appears that the removal of the child is now necessary

or that modification of the terms of protective supervision is necessary to protect the child

pending further proceedings;

(4) The parent, guardian, or custodian has violated the terms of protective supervision

and as a result it appears that removal of the child is now necessary or that modification of

the terms of protective supervision is necessary to protect the child.

(b) Motion to consolidate. In the event that a new petition has been filed based upon any

of the factors set forth in sections (a)(1) - (3), the District of Columbia shall file a motion to

consolidate the new case with the existing case.

(c) Custody. If the child has been taken into custody or if the District of Columbia or the

child's guardian ad litem or counsel seeks the removal of the child, Rule 4(b) shall apply.

The Court may order the child taken into custody pending the shelter care hearing or the

hearing on the motion to revoke or modify protective supervision.

(d) Hearing. If the child is not in custody and shelter care is not sought, the District of

Columbia, the guardian ad litem or counsel for the child may request a hearing upon the

filing of the Motion for Finding of Violation of Terms of Protective Supervision and for

Revocation of Protective Supervision or a Motion for Finding of Violation of Terms of

Protective Supervision and for Modification of the Terms of Protective Supervision.

(e) Standard of proof. The standard of proof at the hearing on a motion filed pursuant to

this rule shall be preponderance of the evidence.

(f) Findings and order. The judicial officer shall enter written findings with respect to each

of the factual allegations of the motion within 10 days following a hearing on the motion

and shall either reaffirm the previous Order of Disposition or modify it, based upon the

findings made. A modified Order shall be in writing and shall include the findings required

by Rule 25. Findings previously made may be incorporated by reference in the modified

Order and findings.

Provenance

Source
dccourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
ae9d06b3b0348c17454f7db6fd78c3d1ea3713b20b09dc5e062dff2ef2404c7f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.C. Super. Ct. Neg. R. 26 — Revocation of Protective… · binding.law