Bindinglaw

DC · rules

D.C. Super. Ct. Neg. R. 14

Conduct of Shelter Care Hearing

activein force · 2017-05-10 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Presentation of report. The agency with case responsibility shall submit to the judicial

officer orally and in writing the report of the initial investigation prepared pursuant to Rule

7. If removal of the child from the home is recommended, the judicial officer shall hear from

the parties on the issue of shelter care in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 13

and D.C. Code § 16-2310(b). Placement with a relative shall also be considered if

requested by the agency or a party.

(b) Probable cause. If the judicial officer determines that removal from the home appears

necessary under the criteria set forth in Rule 13 and D.C. Code § 16-2310(b) and the

parent, guardian or custodian objects to removal, a probable cause hearing shall be held.

If the judicial officer finds that there is probable cause to believe that the allegations

contained in the petition are true, the judicial officer shall hear any additional evidence

concerning the placement of the child, visitation, and services required for the parents or

child. The judicial officer may admit any relevant testimony or other evidence concerning

the placement of the child, visitation and services, whether or not such evidence would be

admissible at the fact-finding hearing, provided that any written reports, social records or

other documents made available to the judicial officer at the hearing also have been made

available to the parties in accordance with Rule 7.

(c) Reasonable efforts. The judicial officer shall determine whether the responsible

agency made reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for the removal of the

child from the home or, alternatively, that the child's removal from the home is necessary

regardless of any services that could be provided to the child or the child's family. In

determining whether the agency has made reasonable efforts to prevent removal, the

judicial officer shall consider:

(1) Dangers to the child and the family and problems precipitating those dangers;

(2) Whether the agency has selected services specifically relevant to the family's

problems and needs;

(3) Whether caseworkers have diligently arranged those services;

(4) Whether appropriate services have been available to the family on a timely basis;

(5) The availability and accessibility of the services provided; and

(6) The result of the interventions made by the agency.

(d) Determination that reasonable efforts are not required. The judicial officer shall

determine whether reasonable efforts are not required in the future to effectuate

reunification, pursuant to D.C. Code § 4-1301.09a, because of the existence of one of the

following circumstances:

(1) A court of competent jurisdiction has determined that the parent:

(A) Subjected a sibling or another child to cruelty, abandonment, torture, chronic

abuse, or sexual abuse;

(B) Committed the murder or voluntary manslaughter of a sibling or another child;

(C) Aided, abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited to commit the murder or

voluntary manslaughter of a sibling or another child; or

(D) Committed an assault that constitutes a felony against the child who is the

subject of a petition before the Family Court, a sibling of such a child, or another child; or

(2) The parent's parental rights have been terminated involuntarily with respect to a

sibling.

(e) Determination of whether continuation in the home is contrary to the welfare of the child

and the date of removal from home. The judicial officer shall determine whether

continuation in the child's home would be contrary to the welfare of the child and, where

the child is or has been removed from the home, shall determine the date of the child's

removal from home.

(f) Discovery and related matters. Parties may request orders with respect to discovery,

investigation, examinations (e.g., drug, physical, mental), release of records (e.g.,

educational, medical), paternity testing and other matters needed to ensure speedy

resolution of the case. The judicial officer also may make a determination with respect to

requests for special advocates or guardians ad litem for parents or other parties. Orders

relating to mediation or case conferencing may be requested at this time.

(g) Additional matters. The judicial officer shall address the following additional matters:

(1) Inquiry as to Potential Relative Placements. When the child has been removed from

home or where removal from home is recommended, the judicial officer shall determine

the names, nature of the familial relationship, place of residence and status of investigation

of relative resources for placement of the child.

(2) Child Support Worksheet. A child support worksheet shall be presented to each

parent to complete and submit to the judicial officer at the next hearing.

(3) Scheduling. The judicial officer shall set the dates for the mediation or pretrial

conference.

(h) Five-day continuance. For good cause shown, any party may request that the judicial

officer continue any part of the initial hearing (including the probable cause hearing) other

than the shelter care determination for a period not to exceed five days or for such

additional time as is consented to by all parties present. If additional time for preparing a

more complete report is granted, the report shall be filed in the court jacket and provided to

counsel for all parties not later than 24 hours prior to the continued hearing.

Provenance

Source
dccourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
b0e7c817f9c93f1b5cc619c6b62a96084fb3575e2d09b812997f0206f76ff036
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.