DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Juv. R. 118
Sealing of Arrest Records
(a) Pursuant to District of Columbia v. Hudson, 404 A.2d 175 (D.C. App. 1979).
(1) Motion for sealing and declaratory relief. Any respondent arrested for the
commission of a delinquent act as defined in D.C. Code § 16-2301(7) who has not been
the subject of a petition may file a motion to seal the records of the respondent's arrest
within 120 days after the charges have been dismissed. For good cause shown and to
prevent manifest injustice, the respondent may file a motion within three years after the
prosecution has been terminated, or at anytime thereafter if the government does not
object. As to arrests occurring on or after July 19, 1979, but before the adoption of this
Rule, a motion may be filed within 120 days after the adoption of this Rule. The motion
shall state facts in support of the movant's claim and shall be accompanied by a statement
of points and authorities in support thereof. The movant may also file any appropriate
exhibits, affidavits, and supporting documents. A copy of the motion shall be served upon
the Office of the Attorney General.
(2) Response by Office of the Attorney General. If the Office of the Attorney General
does not intend to oppose the motion, it shall so inform the Court and the movant, in
writing, within 30 days after the motion has been filed. Otherwise, the Office of the Attorney
General shall not be required to respond to the motion unless ordered to do so by the
Court, pursuant to subparagraph (a)(3) of this Rule.
(3) Initial review by court; summary denial; response by Office of the Attorney General.
If it plainly appears from the face of the motion, any accompanying exhibits and
documents, the record of any prior proceedings in the case, and any response which the
Office of the Attorney General may have filed, that the movant is not entitled to relief, the
Court, stating reasons therefore on the record or in writing, shall deny the motion and send
notice thereof to all parties. In the event the motion is not denied, the Court shall order the
Office of the Attorney General to file a response to the motion, if it has not already done
so. Such response shall be filed and served within 60 days after entry of the Court's order.
The response shall be accompanied by a statement of points and authorities in opposition,
and any appropriate exhibits and supporting documents.
(4) Court's determination of whether to hold a hearing. Upon the filing of the Office of
the Attorney General's response, the Court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing
is required. If it appears that a hearing is not required, the Court shall enter an appropriate
order, pursuant to subparagraph (a)(6) of this Rule. If the Court determines that a hearing
is required, one shall be scheduled promptly.
(5) Determination of motion. If a hearing is held, hearsay evidence shall be
admissible. If, based upon the pleadings or following a hearing, the Court finds by clear
and convincing evidence that the offense for which the movant was arrested did not occur
or that the movant did not commit the offense, the Court shall order the movant's arrest
records retrieved and sealed pursuant to subparagraph (a)(6).
(6) Findings and order; declaratory relief.
(A) Order denying motion. If the Court denies the motion, it shall issue an order and
shall set forth its reasons on the record or in writing.
(B) Order granting motion. If the Court grants the motion, it shall issue an order, in
writing, pursuant to subparagraphs (a)(6)(B)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this Rule.
(i) Retrieval of arrest records and purging of computer records. The Court shall
order the Office of the Attorney General to collect from its office, the law enforcement
agency responsible for the movant's arrest and/or the Metropolitan Police Department all
records of the movant's arrest in their central files, including without limitation all
photographs, fingerprints, and other identification data. The Court shall also direct the
Office of the Attorney General's office to arrange for the elimination of any computerized
record of the movant's arrest. However, the Court shall expressly allow the Office of the
Attorney General's office and the law enforcement agency to maintain a record of the
arrest so long as the record is not retrievable by the identification of the movant. The Court
shall also order the Office of the Attorney General's office to request that the law
enforcement agency responsible for the arrest retrieve any of the aforementioned records
which were disseminated to the Court's Social Services Division, the Youth Services
Administration, and the Family Services Administration, and to collect these records when
retrieved.
(ii) Requirement that arrest records be sealed. The Court shall order the Office of
the Attorney General to file with the Clerk of the Court, within 60 days, all records collected
by the law enforcement agency and in the Office of the Attorney General's own
possession. These records shall be accompanied by a certification that to the best of the
Office of the Attorney General's knowledge and belief no further records exist in the Office
of the Attorney General's own possession or in the possession of the law enforcement
agency's central records files or those of its disseminees, or that, if such records do exist,
steps have been taken to retrieve them. The Court shall order the Clerk to collect all
Superior Court records pertaining to the movant's arrest and cause to be purged any
computerized record of such arrest. However, the Court shall expressly allow the Clerk to
maintain a record of the arrest so long as the record is not retrievable by the identification
of the movant. The Court shall also order the Clerk to file under seal all Superior Court
records so retrieved, together with all records filed by the Office of the Attorney General
pursuant to this paragraph, within seven days after receipt of such records.
(iii) Declaratory relief. The Court shall summarize in the order the factual
circumstances of the challenged arrest and any post-arrest occurrences it deems relevant,
and, if the facts support such a conclusion, shall rule as a matter of law that the movant did
not commit the offense for which the movant was arrested or that no offense had been
committed. A copy of the order shall be provided to the movant or the movant's counsel.
The movant may obtain a copy of the order at any time from the Clerk of the Court, upon
proper identification, without a showing of need.
(7) Sanitization of records involving co-respondents. In a case involving
co-respondents in which the Court orders the movant's records sealed, the Court may
order that only those records, or portions thereof, relating solely to the movant be sealed.
The Court may make an in camera inspection of these records in order to make this
determination. If practicable, the Court may order those records relating to co-respondents
returned to the Office of the Attorney General with all references to the movant sanitized.
(8) Indexing and access to sealed records. The Clerk shall place the records ordered
sealed by the Court in a special file, appropriately and securely indexed in order to protect
its confidentiality, subject to being opened on further order of the Court only upon the
showing of compelling need. A request for access to such sealed records may be made ex
parte. However, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the Clerk shall reply in response to
inquiries concerning the existence of arrest records which may have been sealed pursuant
to this Rule that no records are available.
(9) Appeal. An aggrieved party may note an appeal from a final order entered
pursuant to this Rule in accordance with Rule 4(b) of the General Rules of the District of
Columbia Court of Appeals.
(b) Pursuant to D.C. Code § 16-2335. On motion of a respondent who has been the
subject of a petition filed pursuant to D.C. Code § 16-2305, or on the Court's own motion,
the Court shall vacate its order and findings and shall order the sealing of the case and
social records referred to in D.C. Code §§ 16-2331 and 16-2332 and the law enforcement
records and files referred to in D.C. Code § 16-2333, or those of any other agency active in
the case if it finds that:
(1) two years have elapsed since the final discharge of the respondent from legal
custody or supervision, or since the entry of any other Family Court order not involving
custody or supervision, and
(2) the respondent has not been subsequently convicted of a crime, or adjudicated
delinquent or in need of supervision prior to the filing of the motion, and no proceeding is
pending seeking such conviction or adjudication. Notice of the right to seal and the
procedure for sealing shall be governed by SCR-Family P.
History
COMMENT This rule sets forth the two methods for sealing arrest records of respondents in juvenile cases. Paragraph (a) modifies SCR-Criminal 118 by providing for equitable sealing of records pursuant to Hudson for those cases not covered by D.C. Code § 16-2335 (providing for sealing of records when a petition has been filed). See In Re R.T., 345 A.2d 156 (D.C. App. 1975) (statute provides exclusive authority for sealing juvenile records). It requires a showing by clear and convincing evidence that the offense for which the movant was arrested did not occur or that the movant did not commit the offense. Paragraph (b) outlines the basis for sealing pursuant to D.C. Code § 16-2335. The procedure for sealing records pursuant to D.C. Code § 16-2335 is set forth in detail in SCR-Family P.
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
40b7556fb4ccb7c9c7c43c87ab54a921a35183ea7b7478e75267ec883e719830
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.