DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Juv. R. 110
Physical and Mental Examinations
(a) Authority of the Family Court and place of examination. At any time following the filing
of a petition, the Family Court may order a child examined as an aid in determining his
physical or mental condition in accordance with D.C. Code § 16-2315. The Family Court
may order the examination conducted at the Child Guidance Clinic, or any other
appropriate hospital, agency or institution, or may refer the child to the appropriate District
of Columbia agency with instructions to secure examination within a prescribed period of
time.
(b) Hearing on request for mental health examination. When a request for a mental health
examination of a child is made on motion of one of the parties or by the court, the Family
Court shall notify the parties and hold a hearing on that request to determine whether to
order such examination and whether any such examination should be conducted on an
outpatient or inpatient basis.
(1) Inpatient examination. The Family Court may order an inpatient mental health
examination of a child only if a psychiatrist or qualified psychologist as defined in D.C.
Code § 16-2301(40) certifies that he has examined the child and that the child is presently
in need of a mental health examination that cannot be provided effectively on an outpatient
basis. If the Family Court receives a request for an inpatient mental health examination
that is not filed with a written finding of a psychiatrist or qualified psychologist that the child
is in need of a mental health examination which cannot be effectively provided on an
outpatient basis, the Family Court shall order that a forensic screening be conducted by
the Department of Mental Health within 24 hours or by the next business day.
(2) If the Family Court orders a forensic screening pursuant to subparagraph (b)(1) of
this rule, upon completion of the forensic screening, the psychiatrist or qualified
psychologist shall prepare a written report indicating whether further examination of the
child's mental health is needed and whether such examination can be conducted on an
outpatient basis. The report shall be filed with the Family Court with copies served on the
attorneys of record. A forensic screening report shall include the following information:
(A) a certification of whether the examination can be effectively conducted on an
outpatient basis;
(B) if an inpatient mental health examination is recommended,
(i) an explanation of the need for an inpatient examination;
(ii) a recommendation of an appropriate hospital, facility or institution where the
inpatient examination should be conducted;
(iii) a statement of whether immediate hospitalization is recommended, and if so,
(iv) the bases for such recommendation.
(C) If the forensic screening is ordered in whole or in part to determine whether the
child is competent to proceed:
(i) a preliminary assessment of the child's capacity to understand the proceedings
against him, including the nature of the charges and range of options available to the court
at disposition; and
(ii) the child's ability to assist his attorney.
(3) Prior to any hearing pursuant to subsection (b) of this Rule, the Family Court shall
notify counsel for the child, the child's parents, guardian or custodian, and the Assistant
Attorney General of the request for the examination, the requesting party, and the reasons
proffered for the request.
(4) An order of the Family Court for an inpatient mental health examination shall
provide:
(A) That the hospital or other appropriate facility for the purpose of the mental health
examination shall not discharge the child without further order of the Family Court; and
(B) For a return date for a hearing no later than the 21st day from the date of the
order for inpatient mental health examination.
(c) Court order for access to mental health and educational records. Upon motion of
either party, and after consideration of any response from the opposing party, the Family
Court may issue an order to procure a child's mental health and educational records that
are relevant for purposes of an examination ordered pursuant to D.C. Code § 16-2315(a).
The Family Court order shall provide in detail which mental health and educational records
the order covers and identify who shall have authority to procure the records. The Family
Court shall order that the person who obtains these records pursuant to the Court order
shall not disclose the records or information contained therein except as permitted by the
Court.
(d) Outpatient examination prior to factfinding hearing. If a child is ordered to be
examined on an outpatient basis prior to a factfinding hearing, the Family Court shall
promptly notify counsel for the child, and the child's parents, guardian or custodian, of the
reasons for the examination and the place where the examination is to take place. Upon
request by counsel for the child or the child's parent, guardian, or custodian, the Family
Court shall hold a hearing within 48 hours to establish the necessity for the examination.
(e) Report of inpatient or outpatient examination.
(1) Timing. A written report of the examining psychiatrist or qualified psychologist shall
be filed with the Family Court with copies to attorneys of record no later than 20 days from
the date of the order of examination and no later than one day prior to a hearing. A written
report may be filed with the Family Court with copies to the attorneys of record at any time
after the examining psychiatrist or qualified psychologist has completed the examination.
(2) Content of report conducted in whole or in part for the purpose of determining the
competency of the child to proceed. A written report of the examining psychiatrist or
qualified psychologist shall include the following information: an assessment of whether
the child has the capacity to understand the proceedings against him, including the nature
of the charges and range of potential options available to the court at disposition; an
assessment of the child's ability to assist his attorney; whether the child is incompetent to
proceed, and if so, the reasons and bases for the conclusion and the suspected cause of
the incompetence; an assessment of the likelihood of the child attaining competence in the
reasonably foreseeable future, and if likely, any recommended treatment and services that
may render the child competent in the reasonably foreseeable future; and a certification as
to the least restrictive setting for providing the recommended treatment and services.
(f) HIVIDS testing.
(1) At the request of the Attorney General or his or her designee to have a respondent
tested for the HIVIDS virus, the Family Court shall hold a hearing to determine if there is
probable cause to believe that a victim or eyewitness to an alleged delinquent act may
have been put at risk of the HIVIDS virus by virtue of being a victim or eyewitness to an
alleged delinquent act.
(2) If the Family Court determines that there is probable cause to believe that the victim
or eyewitness was put at risk of the HIVIDS virus by virtue of being a victim or eyewitness
to an alleged delinquent act, the Family Court shall order that the respondent be tested for
the HIVIDS virus and shall order the Attorney General or his or her designee to disclose
the results of the testing to the respondent and the victim or eyewitness and advise the
victim or eyewitness that he or she may disclose the respondent's identity only to his or her
doctor or counselor.
History
COMMENT This Rule supplements D.C. Code § 16-2315. Sections (c) and (d) of the Rule reflect the statutory preference for outpatient examinations. (See D.C. Code § 16-2315(b)). Section (f) implements D.C. Code §16-2315(f).
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
4bf01395b896bb008e297257c29793dc412adc5d76e61ebe981e04ddafd63e92
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.