DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Habilitation R. 7
Periodic Review of Orders for Commitment
(a) ANNUAL REVIEW HEARING UNDER D.C. CODE § 7-1304.11(a). A court decision
ordering commitment of a person with an intellectual disability must be reviewed in a
court hearing annually as follows:
(1) As Scheduled by Court Order. The annual review of a respondent’s commitment
under D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a) must be scheduled by the court.
(2) By Motion. A review of a respondent’s commitment status other than a review
under Rule 7(a)(1) may be commenced by filing a motion for review, or by the court on
its own motion ordering the scheduling of a hearing.
(3) Notice. The court must send notice of the hearing date under Rules 7(a)(1) and (2)
to:
(A) the respondent;
(B) the respondent’s guardian, if any, or substitute decision maker;
(C) the respondent’s attorney;
(D) the respondent’s advocate, if any;
(E) the attorney representing the District of Columbia Department on Disability
Services; and
(F) any other person who has been given permission to receive notice from the
court.
(b) ANNUAL MEETINGS.
(1) Individual Habilitation Plan Meeting. The Department must annually convene an
individual habilitation plan meeting with each respondent to create the person’s annual
individual habilitation plan.
(2) Interdisciplinary Team Meeting. Either at the annual individual habilitation plan
meeting or at a separate meeting, the Department must annually convene an
interdisciplinary meeting with each respondent to assess whether the respondent
wishes to continue or refuse commitment. The interdisciplinary team must:
(A) assess the respondent’s capacity to provide informed consent to continue
commitment under D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a)(1)(E); and
(B) if the respondent lacks capacity to provide informed consent, identify individuals
under D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a)(2) who are reasonably available, mentally capable,
and willing to consent to or refuse continued voluntary commitment on behalf of the
respondent based:
(i) on the respondent’s expressed wishes; or
(ii) if the respondent’s wishes are unknown and cannot be ascertained, on a good
faith belief as to the respondent’s best interests.
(c) REQUIRED FILINGS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS.
(1) Individual Habilitation Plan. The Department must file the individual habilitation
plan no later than 30 days after the annual habilitation plan meeting. The plan must
have been prepared no earlier than one year before the annual review hearing.
(2) Respondent’s Report to the Court on Informed Consent for Voluntary
Commitment. At least 60 days before the annual review hearing, respondent’s counsel
must file and serve on all parties a Report to the Court on Informed Consent for
Voluntary Commitment on the form maintained by the Family Court Central Intake
Center, or on a form that is substantially similar in content and format, and report on the
results of the interdisciplinary team meeting.
(3) Substitute Decision Maker’s Report to the Court on Informed Consent for
Voluntary Commitment. At least 30 days before the annual review hearing, all
individuals identified under D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a)(2) in the respondent’s Report to
the Court on Informed Consent for Voluntary Commitment who wish to be considered
reasonably available, mentally capable, and willing to consent to or refuse continued
voluntary commitment on behalf of the respondent must file and serve all parties with a
Substitute Decision Maker’s Report Regarding Continued Voluntary Commitment on the
form maintained by the Family Court Central Intake Center, or on a form that is
substantially similar in content and format.
(4) Challenge to Substitute Decision Maker’s Report. At least 15 days before the
respondent’s annual review hearing, any individual must file with the court a Challenge
to the Substitute Decision Maker’s Report Regarding Continued Voluntary Commitment
stating the factual basis for challenging the stated decision of an individual with a higher
order of priority on whether the respondent consents to or refuses voluntary
commitment. The challenge must be filed on the form maintained by the Family Court
Central Intake Center, or on a form that is substantially similar in content and format.
(5) Other Documentation. The court may order the preparation and filing of other
documentation necessary to render its decision in connection with the review hearing.
(d) NOTICE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING INFORMED CONSENT OR THE
REFUSAL TO CONSENT. No later than 7 days after receipt of the respondent’s Report
to the Court on Informed Consent for Voluntary Commitment, the clerk must send, by
first-class mail, to each individual identified in that report, a notice that includes the
following:
(1) the date and time of the annual review hearing;
(2) a statement indicating that at least 30 days before the annual review hearing all
individuals identified under D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a)(2) in the respondent’s Report to
the Court on Informed Consent for Voluntary Commitment must indicate to the court
whether the individual is reasonably available, mentally capable, and willing to consent
to or refuse continued voluntary commitment on behalf of the respondent, as well as the
decision the individual would make on behalf of the respondent;
(3) a statement indicating that no less than 15 days before the respondent’s annual
review hearing, any individual with a lower order of priority as listed in D.C. Code § 7-
1304.11(a)(2) who has been provided notice may prepare and file with the court a
Challenge to the Substitute Decision Maker’s Report Regarding Continued Voluntary
Commitment under Rule 7(c)(3) stating the factual basis for challenging the stated
decision of an individual with a higher order of priority on whether the respondent
consents to or refuses voluntary commitment;
(4) a statement indicating that if any individual with a lower order of priority as listed
D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a)(2) files a challenge under Rule 7(c)(3) challenging the stated
decision of an individual with a higher order of priority, the individual should be prepared
to present the position at the date and time of the annual review hearing; and
(5) instructions for filing a Substitute Decision Maker’s Report Regarding Continued
Voluntary Commitment form and a Challenge to Continued Voluntary Commitment form.
(e) EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS REGARDING CAPACITY TO CONSENT OR REFUSE
CONSENT.
(1) Scheduling. The magistrate judge presiding over the habilitation proceedings
calendar will schedule and provide notice of any evidentiary hearings if necessary to
resolve factual issues related to the respondent’s capacity to give informed consent to
continue commitment and, to the extent the respondent lacks capacity, any decision-making by an individual authorized to consent or refuse on the respondent’s behalf. To
the greatest extent possible, such hearings will be held before the annual review
hearing. However, if any individual with a lower order of priority challenges the stated
decision of an individual with a higher order of priority, an evidentiary hearing will be
held at the time scheduled for the annual review hearing.
(2) Written Order. To the extent the magistrate judge resolves factual issues related to
the respondent’s capacity to give informed consent to continue commitment and, to the
extent the respondent lacks capacity, any decision-making by an individual authorized
to consent or refuse on the respondent’s behalf before the annual review hearing, such
findings must be issued in a written order no less than 10 days before the annual review
hearing.
(f) STANDARD FOR TERMINATION OF COMMITMENT. The court must terminate the
respondent’s commitment under D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a)(1) unless it finds that:
(1) the respondent has benefited from the habilitation;
(2) continued residential habilitation is necessary for the respondent’s habilitation
program;
(3) the respondent is a resident of the District of Columbia;
(4) the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that:
(A) based on a comprehensive evaluation of the person performed within one year
before the hearing, the respondent has at least a moderate intellectual disability and
requires habilitation; and
(B) the Department is capable of providing the required habilitation; and
(5) the respondent, or an individual authorized under D.C. Code § 7-1304.11(a)(2),
provides informed consent to continue the respondent’s commitment.
History
COMMENT TO 2026 AMENDMENTS The rule has been substantially amended to implement Title II of the Disability Services Reform Amendment Act of 2018, D.C. Law 22-93, 65 D.C. Reg. 2823 (2018), which ended new commitments other than commitments of persons found incompetent in a criminal case. Former section (c), which required the advocate and the respondent’s attorney to review court filings, has been deleted as surplusage. Former section (d), which addressed a respondent’s option to request an independent comprehensive evaluation and habilitation plan, has been deleted in light of the repeal of D.C. Code § 7-1304.04. (Although the 2018 Act and subsections (a)(5) and (6) of this rule refer to an “individual habilitation plan,” the plan is more commonly referred to as an “individual support plan.”) The rule also has been amended to update the name of the relevant District of Columbia agency. Department on Disability Services has been substituted for Department of Human Services. (In the event of a future name change, references to the Department on Disability Services should be construed to refer to the successor agency, if practicable, until the rules are updated.) As used in these rules, the term “Department” refers to the Department on Disability Services unless stated otherwise. Finally, the rule has been amended to conform with Superior Court Administrative Order No. 11-01, Change of Name to the Mental Health and Habilitation Branch (Jan. 5, 2011), and the general restyling of the Superior Court rules.
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
267dca843e3687efdbef46ca9f361f3dfda2d2863d1eb0fc16754bda1422f231
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.