Bindinglaw

DC · rules

D.C. Super. Ct. Dom. Rel. R. 11

Signing of Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the

activein force · 2018-11-19 – presentact-effective-date

Court; Sanctions

(a) SIGNATURE. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at

least one attorney of record in the attorney's name—or by a party personally if the party

is unrepresented. The paper must state the signer’s address, e-mail address, and

telephone number. If the filing is submitted through the court’s authorized eFiling

program, Rule 5(d)(4)(B)(ii) and (iii) will govern the signing of any electronic filing. A

name affixed by a rubber stamp will not be deemed a signature. Unless a rule or statute

specifically states otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an

affidavit. The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly

corrected after being called to the attorney’s or party’s attention.

(b) REPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT. By presenting to the court a pleading,

written motion, or other paper, including an electronic filing—whether by signing, filing,

submitting, or later advocating it—an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the

best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry

reasonable under the circumstances:

(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause

unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;

(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or

by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for

establishing new law;

(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will

likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or

discovery; and

(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically

so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.

(c) SANCTIONS.

(1) In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court

determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may impose an appropriate

sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the

violation. Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm must be held jointly responsible

for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.

(2) Motion for Sanctions. A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any

other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates Rule 11(b).

The motion must be served under Rule 5, but it must not be filed or be presented to the

court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or

appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets.

If warranted, the court may award to the prevailing party the reasonable expenses,

including attorney’s fees, incurred for the motion.

(3) On the Court’s Initiative. On its own, the court may order an attorney, law firm, or

party to show cause why conduct specifically described in the order has not violated

Rule 11(b).

(4) Nature of a Sanction. A sanction imposed under this rule must be limited to what

suffices to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly

situated. The sanction may include nonmonetary directives; an order to pay a penalty

into court; or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order

directing payment to the movant of part or all of the reasonable attorney’s fees and

other expenses directly resulting from the violation.

(5) Limitations on Monetary Sanctions. The court must not impose a monetary

sanction:

(A) against a represented party for violating Rule 11(b)(2); or

(B) on its own, unless it issued the show-cause order under Rule 11(c)(3) before

voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party that is, or

whose attorneys are, to be sanctioned.

(6) Requirements for an Order. An order imposing a sanction must describe the

sanctioned conduct and explain the basis for the sanction.

(d) INAPPLICABILITY TO DISCOVERY. This rule does not apply to disclosures and

discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions under Rules 26 through 37.

History

COMMENT TO 2018 AMENDMENTS This rule has been amended to conform to the civil rule. COMMENT In recognition of the potential for unnecessary embarrassment of persons involved in the Domestic Relations proceedings, this Rule has been amended to permit the Court to impose sanctions where a party's pleading, motion or other paper is interposed with the intention of embarrassing another party.

Provenance

Source
dccourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
351d482dd3b5b7da5a86b2a2fce7506a05f7503cf89f7f5db28dc501d035f641
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.C. Super. Ct. Dom. Rel. R. 11 — Signing of Pleading… · binding.law