DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 52
Harmless and Plain Error
(a) Harmless Error. Any error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect
substantial rights must be disregarded.
(b) Plain Error. A plain error that affects substantial rights may be considered even
though it was not brought to the court’s attention.
History
COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS This rule is identical to the federal rule. Federal Rule 52(b) was amended in 2002 by deleting the words “or defect” after the words “plain error.” The change was intended to remove any ambiguity in the rule. As noted by the Supreme Court, in reference to the former federal rule, the language “plain error or defect” was misleading to the extent that it might be read to create two separate categories: “plain errors” and “defects affecting substantial rights.” See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732 (1993) (incorrect to read Rule 52(b) in the disjunctive); United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 14 n. 12 (1985) (use of disjunctive in Rule 52(b) is misleading).
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
3d55eb8709f7d17ff2b13f03eaa3181e4b0e961c90131602c0c2ea7d2d23c0d9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.