DC · rules

D.C. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 49.1

Privacy Protection for Filings Made with the Court

activein force · 2023-07-27 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Redacted Filings. Unless the court orders otherwise, in an electronic or paper filing

with the court that contains an individual’s social-security number, taxpayer-identification number or driver’s license or non-driver’s license identification card

number, the name of an individual known to be a child as that term is defined in D.C.

Code § 16-2301 (3), a person’s birth date, a debit card, credit card or other a financial-account number, or the home address of an individual, a party or nonparty making the

filing may include only:

(1) the acronym “SS#”, “TID#”, “DL#, or NDL#” instead of the social-security number,

taxpayer-identification number, driver’s license number and non-driver’s license

identification card number, respectively;

(2) the child’s initials;

(3) the acronym “DOB” instead of the individual’s birth date;

(4) the last four digits of a debit card, credit card, or other financial-account number;

and

(5) the city and state of the home address.

(b) Exemptions from the Redaction Requirement. The redaction requirement does not

apply to the following:

(1) a financial-account number or real property address that identifies the property

allegedly subject to forfeiture in a forfeiture proceeding;

(2) the record of an administrative or agency proceeding;

(3) the official record of a state-court proceeding;

(4) the record of a court or tribunal, if that record was not subject to the redaction

requirement when originally filed;

(5) a filing covered by Rule 49.1(c)(d);

(6) a pro se filing in an action brought under D.C. Code §§ 22-4135 or 23-110

(7) a court filing that is related to a criminal matter or investigation and that is prepared

before the filing of a criminal charge or is not filed as part of any docketed criminal case;

(8) an arrest or search warrant; and

(9) a charging document and an affidavit filed in support of any charging document.

without redaction. The court may later unseal the filing or order the person who made

the filing to file a redacted version for the public record.

(d) Protective Orders. For good cause, the court may by order in a case:

(1) require redaction of additional information; or

(2) limit or prohibit a nonparty’s remote electronic access to a document filed with the

court.

(e) Option for Additional Unredacted Filing Under Seal. A person making a redacted

filing may also file an unredacted copy under seal. The court must retain the unredacted

copy as part of the record.

(f) Option for Filing a Reference List. A filing that contains redacted information may be

filed together with a reference list that identifies each item of redacted information and

specifies an appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed. The list

must be filed under seal and may be amended as of right. Any reference in the case to

a listed identifier will be construed to refer to the corresponding item of information.

(g) Waiver of Protection of Identifiers. A person waives the protection of Rule 49.1(a) as

to the person’s own information by filing it without redaction and not under seal.

History

COMMENT TO 2023 AMENDMENTS Section (a) has been amended to delete the term “minor” as intended by the 2009 amendment to this rule. COMMENT TO THE 2009 AMENDMENT This Rule is identical to the Federal Rule with the following exceptions. Paragraph (a) of this Rule requires redaction of several categories of information not covered by the Federal Rule: driver’s license and non-driver’s license identification card numbers, and credit and debit card numbers. See D.C. Code § 28-3851 (3)(A) (defining “Personal information” for purposes of the Consumer Personal Information Security Breach Notification Act of 2006, D.C. Code § 28-3851 et seq.) Paragraph (a) also substitutes the term “child” for the term “minor” and refers to a locally applicable definition of that term. Subparagraph (a)(3) differs from the Federal Rule, which requires redaction of the month and date of birth, but not the year of birth. This Rule requires redaction of the entire date of birth and use of the acronym “DOB” in its place. Subparagraph (b)(6) refers to post-conviction proceedings under local, rather than federal, law. Paragraph (c) of the Federal Rule (“Immigration Cases”) is omitted from this Rule as locally inapplicable.

Provenance

Source: dccourts.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-14
Edition: 2026-09-14
Content hash: 98de66a80a426bf2461c0b6254ef0ba2a7f88270881f63f3a6b00e05d84edd53

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs