DC · rules
D.C. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 29
Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal
(a) BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE JURY. After the government closes its evidence or
after the close of all the evidence, the court on the defendant's motion must enter a
judgment of acquittal of any offense for which the evidence is insufficient to sustain a
conviction. The court may on its own consider whether the evidence is insufficient to
sustain a conviction. If the court denies a motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close
of the government's evidence, the defendant may offer evidence without having
reserved the right to do so.
(b) RESERVING DECISION. The court may reserve decision on the motion, proceed
with the trial (where the motion is made before the close of all the evidence), submit the
case to the jury, and decide the motion either before the jury returns a verdict or after it
returns a verdict of guilty or is discharged without having returned a verdict. If the court
reserves decision, it must decide the motion on the basis of the evidence at the time the
ruling was reserved.
(c) AFTER JURY VERDICT OR DISCHARGE.
(1) Time for a Motion. A defendant may move for a judgment of acquittal, or renew
such a motion, within 14 days after a guilty verdict or after the court discharges the jury,
whichever is later.
(2) Ruling on the Motion. If the jury has returned a guilty verdict, the court may set
aside the verdict and enter an acquittal. If the jury has failed to return a verdict, the court
may enter a judgment of acquittal.
(3) No Prior Motion Required. A defendant is not required to move for a judgment of
acquittal before the court submits the case to the jury as a prerequisite for making such
a motion after jury discharge.
(d) CONDITIONAL RULING ON A MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL.
(1) Motion for a New Trial. If the court enters a judgment of acquittal after a guilty
verdict, the court must also conditionally determine whether any motion for a new trial
should be granted if the judgment of acquittal is later vacated or reversed. The court
must specify the reasons for that determination.
(2) Finality. The court's order conditionally granting a motion for a new trial does not
affect the finality of the judgment of acquittal.
(3) Appeal.
(A) Grant of a Motion for a New Trial. If the court conditionally grants a motion for a
new trial and an appellate court later reverses the judgment of acquittal, the trial court
must proceed with the new trial unless the appellate court orders otherwise.
(B) Denial of a Motion for a New Trial. If the court conditionally denies a motion for a
new trial, an appellee may assert that the denial was erroneous. If the appellate court
later reverses the judgment of acquittal, the trial court must proceed as the appellate
court directs.
History
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS In accordance with the 2009 amendments to the federal rule, this rule was amended to expand the 7-day filing period for motions to 14 days—an amendment that reflects the time-calculation changes made to Rule 45. COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS This rule has been redrafted to conform to the general restyling of the federal rules in 2002. It is identical to the federal rule. This rule includes paragraph (d) of the federal rule, which was not previously adopted by the Superior Court. It also includes the 2005 amendment to the federal rule. In that year, Federal Rules 29 (Motion for Judgment of Acquittal), 33 (New Trial) and 34 (Arresting Judgment) were amended to remove the requirement that the court act within seven days on motions for enlargement of time. A conforming amendment has been made to Rule 45 (Computing and Extending Time).
Provenance
- Source
- dccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
38bc550c24f8261f62af55455682746bb55c663c44d0229efceb0ac196d94e52
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.