Bindinglaw

DC · rules

D.C. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 1

Scope; Authority of the Chief Judge; Definitions

activein force · 2017-05-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) SCOPE. These rules govern the procedure in all criminal proceedings in the

Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

(b) AUTHORITY OF THE CHIEF JUDGE. The Chief Judge by order may arrange and

divide the business of the Criminal Division as may be necessary for the sound

administration of justice, except that branches within the Division may be created or

eliminated only by court rule.

(c) TAX DIVISION. All proceedings brought by the District of Columbia for the

imposition of criminal penalties under the provisions of the statutes relating to taxes

levied by or in behalf of the District of Columbia shall be conducted in the Tax Division.

(d) DEFINITIONS. The following definitions apply to these rules:

(1) “Attorney for the government” means:

(A) the Attorney General of the United States or an authorized assistant;

(B) a United States Attorney or an authorized assistant;

(C) the Attorney General for the District of Columbia or an authorized assistant; and

(D) any other attorney authorized by law to conduct proceedings under these rules

as a prosecutor.

(2) “Civil action” refers to a civil action in the Superior Court.

(3) “Court” means a judge or magistrate judge performing functions authorized by law,

except where the term is used to mean the court as an institution.

(4) “District Court” means all United States District Courts.

(5) “Judge” means the Chief Judge, an Associate Judge, or a Senior Judge of the

Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

(6) “Law enforcement officer” or “investigative officer” means an officer or member of

the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia or of any other police

force operating in the District of Columbia, or an investigative officer or agent of the

United States or the District of Columbia.

(7) “Magistrate Judge” means a Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of the District

of Columbia as defined in D.C. Code §§ 11-1732 and -1732A (2012 Repl. & 2017

Supp.).

(8) “Oath” includes an affirmation.

(9) “Organization” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 18.

(10) “Superior Court” means the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

(11) “Telephone” means any technology for transmitting live electronic voice

communication.

(12) “Victim” means any person or entity defined as a “victim” or “crime victim” in D.C.

Code § 23-1905 (2) (2017 Supp.) or as a “crime victim” in 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (e)(2)(A).

(13) “Video teleconference” means any technology for transmitting live electronic

video communication.

History

COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS Subsections (d)(11), defining “telephone,” and (d)(12), defining “victim,” were added to correspond with the 2008 and 2011 amendments to the federal rule. The definition of “video teleconference” is unique to the Superior Court rule; it was added to explain the term, which appears throughout the rules. COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS This rule has been redrafted to conform to the general restyling of the federal rules in 2002. It differs from the federal rule in several respects. Paragraph (a) makes clear that these rules apply to all criminal proceedings in the Superior Court. D.C. Code § 11-902 (b) (2012 Repl.) permits the Superior Court by rule to establish branches within the Division. This rule eliminates the Felony, Misdemeanor and District of Columbia-Traffic Branches of the Criminal Division to permit greater flexibility in case management and utilization of resources. Paragraph (b) reflects the Chief Judge’s authority pursuant to D.C. Code § 11-906 (b) (2012 Repl.) to organize the business of the Superior Court. It replaces former paragraph (d). Paragraph (d) (Definitions) differs from the federal rule in several ways to reflect local practice. In addition, consistent with the incorporation of Federal Rule 54 into Federal Rule 1, the definitional paragraphs of former Superior Court Rule 54 have been moved, as modified, to this rule. Subparagraph (d)(3), defining “court,” substitutes “judge or magistrate judge” for “federal judge” and adds the phrase “except where the term is used to mean the court as an institution.”

Provenance

Source
dccourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
0627d7bd80a85aa916c79940adeaf50cb058d69df4429f4aa0d45891038c2678
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.C. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 1 — Scope; Authority of the… · binding.law